USA India
Home Articles UserTV Press Releases Dictionary Books Education Careers B-Channels Resources Forums Blogs Classifieds
Thursday 20 Nov, 2008 eNewsletter Register Login
Articles
Today in Articles
Recent Articles
Popular Articles
Community Recommended
Most viewed Articles
View all Articles
Article Archives
Articles by Classification
Features
Opinions
How-to-Advice
News & Reviews
Local Profiles & News
E-business
CU Gamer
Articles Categories
Communications
Electronics
Hardware
Networking / Security
Operating Systems
Software
Programming
Opensource
Database
Internet
Wireless
Mobile Computing
Graphics
Multimedia
Gadgets
Others
Apple Mac
Autodesk
Cisco
Citrix
Google
IBM
Microsoft
Oracle
PHP
SUN
VoIP
Business Skills
Marketing
Linux
Printers
Games
Go Green
Cyber Security
Employment
Education
 
  Submit an Article Articles Home
Articles >> Internet
Court Ruling Starts the Process of Ruling Out Offensive Content.
Posted by : Jordan Hudgens | Sun, Apr 27 2008 | 09:04:25
Tags : video sites, social networking,government regulations
Rating :
Comments (0) Views (3) Email Article Blogs Forums
Print Article Bookmarks
Add to More..
 

Two recent court rulings have started the long awaited strike on offensive and damaging user submitted content in regard to online communities. The legal decisions have left online social networking websites vulnerable to future attacks from licensed content providers as it relates to the user submission medium, forcing both ISP’s and websites to a level of increased accountability.

News.com reported on April 8th, “For more than a decade, Web site operators have enjoyed a broad legal shield against lawsuits filed over material posted by their users, which has let user-driven sites like YouTube and MySpace.com flourish.  But a pair of recent rulings by federal district judges has chipped away at that protective shield. If those decisions are upheld on appeal, and if more judges follow suit, Web site operators and Internet service providers may find themselves compelled to police what their users post-or face the unsettling prospect of being held liable for the contents.”

Everyone in the online industry has known this day was coming and it is finally here; the US courts are finally taking note of the fact that certain online companies are earning literally billions of dollars by distributing illegal content.  With the majority of all computer users making a daily habit of visiting sites such as YouTube, Myspace, and Facebook; the US Government is beginning to take action in order to protect the rights of content producers who have been getting robbed for the past decade along with protecting users from online predators.

So how did we get to a point where companies believed that the Internet was the equivalent of “International Waters” in regard to content ownership and security?  It all stems from a court ruling dating back to the early World Wide Web days of 1996.  You will hear the social networking and online video site executives quote from a section of the 1996 Telecommunications Act on a regular basis, stating that websites are not liable for their users' posts or other content they upload.  Attempting to deflect the blame of copyright infringement on users has become modus operandi for the past decade, however that could all be coming to an end shortly.

The decision points out that websites are ultimately responsible for the content placed on their sites by end-users.  Recent court rulings have expanded this controversy beyond just malicious content, and will likely begin targeting sites that endorse the posting of copyright and brand infringements, racially charged content, and many of the other genres popular in the user generated market. This is clearly a major blow to those heavily visited sites whose principal business model depends on user-generated postings, and what I have long believed to be illegally distributed content.

This is a very positive development that not only reinforces content owner rights, but it also opens the door for the next generation of online video and social media companies that have a sense of responsibility to content providers and their respective user bases. The future rightfully belongs to those companies who focus on professionally produced content and its legal distribution.

Are these rulings going to change the way the Internet treats user-generated content? Probably not immediately, however it is the initial legal action that is required in order for Internet companies to realize that the status quo of online content is about to change.  The courts were surprisingly strategic with their decision; notice that they did not directly attack copyrighted or illegal online content.  Instead they simply are pushing for Internet Service Providers (ISP’s) and social communities to begin policing every piece of content uploaded by users.  This may not seem like an impossible task until you realize that YouTube boasts over 100,000 video uploads daily.  To have employees review 100% of the daily uploads would be an impossible task.  And this does not even touch upon the other types of content that the court ruling talked about such as fake user profiles.

Therefore, this ruling could be a Trojan horse to the online industry, by compelling community websites and ISP’s to start becoming responsible for monitoring content, the courts will be forcing these companies to change their business models in order to avoid lengthy and expensive legal battles.  Up to this point the Internet social networking and video sites have feigned ignorance and simply said they are free hosting locations and that the site members were accountable for their content submissions.  However, that same argument was repeated again and again from the former free music downloading powerhouses.  In the online business world when a month equals a traditional year, how soon we all forget the not so distant past.

This move towards online responsibility is not simply a domestic anomaly, the website: www.tv-links.co.uk was a site that linked to sites such as Google Video, YouTube, Dailymotion, Veoh and a wide array of others which host illegally distributed TV shows, movies, music videos along with many other illegally uploaded videos.  The Gloucestershire County Council, in association with a group called the FACT, raided the site’s servers and arrested the 26-year-old man from Cheltenham who ran the site.  Stories like this are typically the foreshadowing of much larger scale targets; the most probable that is at high risk is Google, due to their $1.6 billion dollar acquisition of the leader in online video, YouTube.

When the record labels started to attack companies like Napster they would state the millions of dollars they were losing in record sales due to the fact that users were able to download the songs they wanted for free and therefore had no need to buy a $20 CD.  TV and Movie studios have just as much if not more in lost revenue from the online video revolution.  Licensed content from providers such as FOX, NBC, Viacom and CBS, to name a few, receive and average of $25-$150 in advertising revenue for every thousand times their videos are watched online.  Meanwhile, YouTube hit the 100 million daily video stream mark in July of 2006, with a very large number of copyrighted videos being viewed.  It was because of this activity, and the large-scale acquisition by Google, that Viacom made the first sizable move on the legal front, with the serving of a $1 billion dollar lawsuit against YouTube on Mar 13, 2007.

The decisions from the courts are simply the first and very necessary step in legitimizing the online video industry.  This will work heavily against the highly trafficked sites that have built their businesses on distributing video content illegally.  With these laws now being enforced, there will start to be a steady migration to websites that aggregate professionally produced content.  We've seen this exact scenario played out previously in the music industry, with the rise and fall of companies like Napster, which was replaced by the current industry leader iTunes.

And very similar to the music migration, once the courts definitively force websites to be accountable for the material they distribute, we will see a steady move from sites like YouTube to companies that solely offer licensed and professionally produced content.  And for those of you who believe that Google’s ownership of YouTube makes it an impenetrable force, please remember the very recent decline of Microsoft at the hands of the domestic and International courts.

Looking into the future of the online social media industry, you will see the increasingly media savvy Internet users begin spending their time on websites that provide high quality content that is both entertaining and legal.  And don’t worry, YouTube and MySpace are not going away anytime soon, they have a clearly defined choice in front of them where they can decide to become responsible companies that have long-term perspectives or alternatively go fighting to the bitter end with their original business model in hand.


About the Author:
Jordan Hudgens is the Founder and CEO of Vidshadow, Inc.  A publicly traded company located in Southern California, Vidshadow is one of the Internet’s fastest growing video distribution networks providing solutions to advertisers content providers and affiliate websites. Vidshadow offers advanced streaming video technologies for consumers and corporate enterprises to leverage for increased monetization and expanded brand reach. For more information, please visit www.Vidshadow.com.

 
 
 
Comments (0) Views(3) Email Article Blogs Forums
Print Article Bookmarks
Add to More..
 Please comment on this article. Our writers would like to hear your opinion.
Sorry!! There are no records to display
Comments
Your Name * E-mail Address * Your Website
 
Your Comments *
Enter code shown below
 
View all | Recent | Popular | Community Recommended | Most Viewed | Today in Article
Features | Opinions | How-to | News & Reviews | Local Profiles & News |
 
 
Banner
 
Sponsored Links
Copyright © 1994-2008 ComputerUser, Inc., All Rights Reserved All marks are trademarks of ComputerUser Media. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of ComputerUser, Inc. is prohibited.
About us | Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Legal | Trademark/Copyright | Awards | Advertise | Writer guidelines | Sitemap | Contact | FAQ's | Feedback  | Link to us

Here are the topics we cover computer certification computer careers computer training computer games consulting data recovery data security digital entertainment emerging technology gadget reviews handheld computers hardware reviews home automation home networks home office how-to advice internet linux local companies local news local profiles macintosh mp3 players network security online music online security open-source small-business technology soho software reviews technology books technology dictionary vpn web site reviews wi-fi windows wireless technology tech articles tech news press releases tech dictionary education resources career solutions create your personal blog upload your videos become a writer usergroups special interest group SIG 3com cipts adobe adobe certified expert apc ncpi apple achds acpt acsa actc avaya bea 8.1 certified administrator 8.1 certified architect 8.1 certified developer 9 certified administrator bicsi rcdd checkpoint ccmse ccsa ccsa ngx ccse ccse ng plus with ai ccse ngx cisco access routing and lan switching ccda ccdp ccie ccip ccna ccnp ccnp old ccsp ccvp crmam ip communications optical proctored exams for validating knowledge sales specialist storage networking vpn and security wireless lan citrix cca 3.0 cca 4.0 cca 4.5 cca xp ccea 3.0 ccea 4.0 ccea xp ccia ciw ciw associate ciw certified instructor master ciw admin master ciw designer master ciw enterprise developer security analyst comptia a+ network+ security+ server+ computer associates ca cusa cuse cwna cwna cwsp dell eccouncil cea cep certified ethical hacker chfi e-commerce architect emc emc specialist implemenation technology foundations enterasys ese eta exam express exin exin itil extreme networks ena ens filemaker f7cd f8cd fortinet fortigate foundry cne fujitsu fujitsu guidance software ence hdi css hda hdm hdsa hitachi hitachi certified professional hp ais apc app aps ase certified systems developer csa cse master ase huawei hcne hyperion hcp ibm advanced deployment professional advanced technical expert application developer business process analyst certified administrator certified advanced system administrator certified advanced technical expert certified associate developer certified enterprise developer certified solution designer certified specialist certified systems expert database administrator db2 deployment professional enterprise developer eserver certified specialist ibm on demand business solution advisor solution designer solutions developer solutions expert storage administrator system administator iisfa cifi intel isaca cisa isc cissp sscp iseb itil ism cpm juniper jncia jncis legato lcaa lcea lotus clp lpi lpic level 1 lpic level 2 lpic level 3 macromedia mcafee mcdata csnd microsoft crm mbs mcad .net mcdba mcdst mcitp mcp mcpd mcsa longhorn mcsa 2003 mcsa 2008 mcsd .net mcse mcse 2000 security mcse 2000 to mcse 2003 upgrade mcse 2003 mcse 2003 messaging mcse 2003 security mcse 2008 mcts microsoft business solutions microsoft partner competency mile2 cnsa network appliance nac-na nac-nie naca nace nacp network general sniffer certified professional nokia nokia security administrator nortel ncde ncds ncse ncss ncts novell5 cna 5 cne 6 cna 6 cne 6.5 cne cne upgrade omg ocup oracle 10g dba 10g oca 11i 8i dba 9i dba 9i internet application developer oca ocp8 to ocp8i dba upgrade exam pmi project management professional polycom pcve redhat rhce rhct sair sas institute sas scp saas scp snia snia certified architect snia certified professional snia certified systems engineer snia storage networking certification program administrator professional associate symantec scse scsp scta scts teradata tca v2r5 tcad v2r5 tcda v2r5 tcis v2r5 tcm v2r5 tcp v2r5 tia ccnt ctp tibco tcp trusecure ticsa veritas infraguard chamber of commerce vcp vmware certified professional webex linkedin facebook myspace Professional page layout, image editing, vector illustration, and print production Website design, development, prototyping, and blogging Creation of rich interactive content Industry-standard visual effects and motion graphics Video capture, editing, and production; DVD titling; and digital audio, Adobe Photoshop CS3 extended, Adobe illustrator CS3,Adobe indesign CS3,Adobe Acrobat 8 Professional, Adobe Flash CS3 Professional, Adobe Dreamweaver CS3,Adobe Contribute CS3,Adobe Fireworks CS3,Adobe After Effects CS3 Professional, Adobe Premiere Pro CS3,Adobe Soundbooth CS3,Adobe Encore CS3,Adobe OnLocation,Adobe Bridge CS3,Adobe Version Cue CS3,Adobe Device Central CS3,Adobe Stock Photos, Intel Pentium 4 (1.4GHz processor for DV; 3.4GHz processor for HDV), Intel Centrino, Intel Xeon, (dual 2.8GHz processors for HD), or Intel Core, Duo (or compatible) processor; SSE2-enabled processor required for AMD systems Microsoft Windows XP with Service Pack 2 or Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium, Business, Ultimate, or Enterprise (certified for 32-bit editions) 1GB of RAM for DV; 2GB of RAM for HDV and HD; more RAM recommended when running multiple components 10GB of available hard-disk space (additional free space required during installation) Dedicated 7,200 RPM hard drive for DV and HDV editing; striped disk array storage (RAID 0) for HD; SCSI disk subsystem preferred Microsoft DirectX compatible sound card (multichannel ASIO-compatible sound card recommended),1,280x1,024 monitor resolution with 32-bit color adapter Blu-ray burner required for Blu-ray Disc creation OHCI compatible IEEE 1394 port for DV and HDV capture, export to tape, and transmit to DV device QuickTime 7.1.2 software required to use QuickTime features Broadband Internet connection required for Adobe Stock Photos* and other services

3PAR, Accellion, Acronis, Actional, Active Endpoints, ActiveGrid, activePDF, ActiveServers, ActiveState, Actuate, Adaptec, Agile Software, AGiLiENCE, Agilysys, Akorri, AlachiSoft, Alter Logic, Altor Networks, Altova, AMD, AMDAHL, Amentra, Amyuni, anacubis, Apani, APC, Appcelerator, AppSense, AppStream, Array Networks, Ascential, Astaro, Attune Systems, Autodesk, AutoVirt, Availl, Avanade, Azul Systems, Barracuda Networks, BEA Systems, B-hive, Black Duck Software, Blackbaud, Blade Network Technologies, Blue Coat, Blue Lane, BlueArc, BlueNote Networks, BluePheonix Solutions, BMC Software, Borland, Bristol Technology, Brix Networks, BroadVision, Brocade, Burton Group, Business Objects, CA, CalAmp, Cassatt, Cast Iron Systems, Catbird, Cayenne Technologies, Ceedo Technologies, Cenzic, Certeon, CiRBA, Cisco Systems, Cision, Citrix Systems, ClearApp, ClearCube Technology, CollabNet, Compass America, Composite Software, Compugen, Compuware, Configuresoft, Continuity Software, Coraid, Courion, Coyote Point Systems, Crescendo Networks, CSC, DataCore, DataSynapse, Dell, Desktone, Digipede Technologies, Double-Take Software, Ecora Software, EDS, eG Innovations, Egenera, Elastra Corporation, Electric Cloud, Embotics, EMC Corporation, Emulex, Endeavors Technology, Enigmatic Corporation, Enterprise Management Associates, Entuity, EqualLogic, Ericom Software, ESRI, EVault, eXludus Technologies, F5 Networks, FalconStor, FastScale Technology, Foedus, Force10 Networks, Fortisphere, Forum Systems, Fujitsu, GemStone Systems, Getronics, GlassHouse, Green Hills Software, Grid Dynamics, GridGain Systems, GT Software, Hitachi, HP, Hyper9, Hyperic, IBM, ICEsoft, IGEL Technology, Illumita, ILOG, IMEX Research, Information Builders, Ingres, InstallFree, Integrien, Intel, Intellium, International Computerware, iTKO LISA, JBoss, Juniper, KACE, Kidaro, LeftHand Networks, Leostream, Lifeboat Distribution, Liquid Computing Corporation, Liquid Technology, Lynux Works, Mainline, ManageIQ, Managed Methods, ManageSoft, Marathon Technologies, McAfee, Mellanox Technologies, Microsoft, Mid-Atlantic Computers, Mindbridge Software, Mindreef, MKS, MonoSphere, Motorola, MQSoftware, mySoftIT, NASTEL, Ncomputing, NEC, Neocleus, NeoPath Networks, Neoware, NetApp, Netegrity, Neterion, Netuitive, Neverfail, Nexaweb, NextAxiom, Nimbus, Nimsoft, Niyuta, NoMachine, Novell, ONStor, Opalis Software, Open Kernel Labs, OpenSpan, OPNET Technologies, Optaros, OpTier, Oracle, Pano Logic, Parallels, Parasoft, Perforce Software, PHD Technologies, Phoenix Technologies, Phurnace Software, Pillar Data Systems, PlateSpin/Novell, Progress Software, Prolifics, ProSync Technology, Provision Networks, QLogic, Quest Software, Racemi, Raritan, Raxco Software, Red Hat, Reflex Security, Resolution Enterprises, RingCube Technologies, Riverbed Technology, Rogue Wave Software, RSA Security, Sagnet Solutions, SanDisk Corporation, SAP, SAVVIS, ScaleMP, Scalent Systems, Seanodes, Secure Command, Secure Computing, Sentillion, Shavlik Technologies, ServInt Internet Services, Silpion IT Solutions, SIMtone, Skytap, Skyway Software, Software AG, Sonasoft, SourceGear, Splunk, StackSafe, SteelEye Technology, StillSecure, StoneFly, Stonesoft, Stoneware, StoreVault, StrikeIron, STT WebOS, Sun Microsystems, SunGard, Supermicro Computer, Surgient, SWsoft, Sybase, Symantec, Systar, TBD Networks, Tenfold, TheInfoPro, Thinstall, Third Brigade, TIBCO Software, Tidal Software, Tideway Systems, TOA Solutions, TRANGO Virtual Processors, Trend Micro, Tresys Technology, Trigence, Tripwire, Ulteo, Unisys, United Devices, VaST Systems, VDIworks, VeeAm Software, Verari Systems, Verio, VeriSign, Vicom Computer Services, VirtenSys, Virtera, Virtual Iron, VirtualLogix, Virtugo Software, Virtutech, VisionCore, Vizioncore, VKernel, VMLogix, vmSight, VMware, Vordel, vThere-Sentillion, Vyatta, WaveMaker, Web Age Solutions, WSO2, Wyse Technology, XDS, XenoCode, Xiotech, xkoto, Xsigo Systems, Zenith Optemedia, Zeus Technology.