DENVER April 25, 2012 The Lanier Law Firm Brighton, Colo.
April 25, 2012 Denver March 17, 1998
"Apple’s Siri and Google’s Google Voice Actions make cell phones and other electronic devices much more useful for customers, but those products and others would never have been possible if not for the technology embodied in Potter’s patent," says Mr. Banys. "The defendants have collected a fortune using Potter’s technology, and we are asking the court for at least a reasonable royalty based on their unauthorized use."
Cupertino, Calif Japan Redmond, Wash. Mountain View, Calif. Taiwan South Korea South Korea U.S.A. Schaumburg, Ill. China USA Japan Japan China Atlanta Irving, Texas Finland
Potter Voice Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc., et al Colorado
Houston Los Angeles New York Palo Alto outstanding trial attorneys pharmaceutical liability asbestos exposure intellectual property business litigation product liability maritime law bad faith insurance claims sports and entertainment law
SOURCE The Lanier Law Firm